What are they saying - OHSAA  To Vote On A New Multiplier

By Dave Schmidt – www.theseniorreports.com

 

EDITOR’S NOTEWe hope to update this article before the vote after school officials have time to review the new issue.

 

(3-24-13) - In May members of the Ohio High School Athletic Association will vote on a new multiplier after the separate tournament referendum was withdrawn during the Boy’s State Basketball Championships in Columbus.  Below are quotes from around the state from various articles (see links below). 

 

%- If this referendum fails the Wayne County group will reintroduce a petition to have the separate tournament referendum put back on the ballot in May 2014.

 

Commissioner Daniel B. Ross

 

*-“Some ofthe initial discussions by the original OHSAA Competitive Balance Committee included some ofthe same elements that are in this new proposal,” Ross said. “It is generally believed that in addition to the size of enrollment, students on a school’s team roster who are from outside that school’s geographic boundary or attendance zone does affect athletic success. So this concept is not something that is entirely

new.

 

“The beauty of this new proposal is that all schools, public and non-public, would pass through the same filter when applying the new formula. In addition, the roster data that will be input by the member schools in this formula will be both objective and independently verifiable. By approving this proposal, member schools will be authorizing our Board of Directors and staff to develop and test such a formula over

the next two-plus years so that the exact factors added to a school’s enrollment and any kinks in the data entry, collection and final formulas can be worked out.

 

“I want to thank the administrators from Wayne County who worked cooperatively on finding an alternative to separate tournaments and to the OHSAA Board of Directors for allowing the new proposal to be placed on the referendum ballot,” Ross said. “I truly believe the climate from the last vote on separating the tournaments has changed and this year’s vote would have come down to the wire. That being said, I also believe separation of the tournaments would have had many far reaching ramifications that likely would

have changed the landscape of interscholastic athletics in Ohio for years.”

 

@-  It's the fairest proposal and the best one so far,'' Ross said. “It deals with the issue about where kids come from that play for your school. It only deals with the kids that are playing in that sport. It hits the crux of the issue.''

 

“We feel very comfortable with that,'' Ross said. “There's always going to be a group that feels the tradition is a factor because success breeds success. The socioeconomic factor we believe does have an effect. The proposal we have on the table, at least right now, does not have those two as part of the tenets of it.''

 

 

$-“Some of the initial discussions by the original OHSAA Competitive Balance Committee included some of the same elements that are in this new proposal,” Ross said. “It is generally believed that in addition to the size of enrollment, students on a school’s team roster who are from outside that school’s geographic boundary or attendance zone does affect athletic success. So this concept is not something that is entirely new.”

 

Triway Superintendent Dave Rice

 

@- "I believe this decision is in the best interest of kids and is a better alternative than separate tournaments and I'll sleep fine at night.

 

We never stopped looking at other options, and we finally hit on something recently that we hoped people could get behind and support.''

#- “The wheels have been turning ever since the petition was filed trying to think of better solutions,” Rice said. “I’m very appreciative of the board for passing this and continuing to work on it with us. Will there be backlash (from schools that wanted split tournaments), absolutely. But we are doing what we feel is the right thing.

“We’ve said all along the goal wasn’t to have separate tournaments,” Rice added. “I can’t emphasize that enough. We finally hit on something we felt like would work for everyone. ... I believe this decision is in the best interest of kids and is a better alternative than separate tournaments, and I’ll sleep fine at night.”

**"In their opinion, if Division II schools get multiplied and bumped up then their day just got more difficult," said Rice. "For the smaller Division I public schools it probably is going to make their lives more difficult but I don't have the answer for that. We try to look at the greater good for everybody but there is no perfect solution. This seemed to attack a large majority of the districts that we serve."

Dalton Superintendent Scott Beatty

 

@- “We never wanted opportunities taken away from young people,'' Beatty said. “When you start creating a system that would do that, you really have to take a step back at what is being accomplished here.''

 

Beatty received angry text messages from colleagues who supported the effort.

 

“They're not happy with the situation, but we think this is a better overall solution.'' 

 

#-“It’s simple and it makes a lot of sense,” Beatty said. “It’s fair and it applies the same standards to every district whether it’s public or non-public. Everyone runs through the same filter.”

 

Hudson boys basketball coach Jeff Brink

 

@- “It's not solving the problem,'' he said. “Our system is broke right now. I don't know what the answer is, but I think the multiplier is putting a Band-Aid on an open gash.”

 

“They let Division I down,'' he said. “It's kind of like when you have a barn and you have a pile of crap in a stall and you push it to the next stall. The pile of crap is still in the barn and it still stinks. We haven't addressed the problem of the pile of crap in the barn.

 

“Ninety percent of schools in Ohio still have no chance of competing for a championship.''

 

Villa Angela-St. Joseph coach Babe Kwazniak

 

@- “I think it's a good compromise.'' 

 

Former St. Ignatius athletic director director and a member of the OHSAA competitive-balance committee  Dale Gabor

 

@- “The separate tournaments was a lose-lose for everybody, and now I think we have a win-win,'' 

 

%- “It basically forced our hand to finally find a workable solution,” he said. “Now, at least we’re committed to finding a resolution to avoid separate tournaments. Most of us would agree that separate tournaments was not the answer, but doing nothing was not the answer, either.”

 

%- Austintown Fitch football coach Phil Annarella

 

“I don’t think splitting the schools was ever necessarily the answer but people are trying to come up with some kind of solution.” “They’ve done similar things in other states, using a multiplier, and I think that’s ultimately the right way to go, or at least to be headed in that direction. Will it pass? Who knows? But I know enough people are upset enough to warrant attention to the situation.”

 

“When they start talking parochial or private schools and public schools everybody right away jumps on the bandwagon and says public schools have open enrollment,” he said. “That is true, but in open enrollment if a kid decides to go to another public school they have to sit out a year. I don’t know how many people understand that. How many kids are going to give up a year of playing sports just to transfer to another school? Open enrollment is a misnomer and it’s not what everybody thinks it is.”

 

Pat Pavlansky, girls basketball coach at Canfield

 

$- “We love what we have at Canfield, we have great kids, we have great support,” “Whoever they tell us to play, we’ll go play them and that’s fine with me.”

 

Warren Harding football coach Steve Arnold

 

$- “If you want to be considered an elite team you have to beat the top teams whether they are public or parochial,” “In talking with coaches at private schools, I don’t think they wanted separation from public schools and I don’t know how many public school coaches wanted the separation.

“It is what it is. You just to have to go out and play the game. As coaches we’re not in position to make the call, so we just deal with it and move forward.”

 

$- Cardinal Mooney football coach P.J. Fecko

 

“It’s everything in life whether it’s politics and political parties or this or that. You are never going to make 100 percent of the population of whatever you are doing happy,” he said. “You just need to go forward and try to put something in place that satisfies the majority of the people. No matter what side you’re on, no matter what side you agree with or disagree with, we know it’s impossible to satisfy everyone.”

 

%- Newark Catholic principal Beth Hill

 

 “Sure, this will affect us, but it sure beats a split, which we were all very fearful of,” Hill said. “We want to remain in the OHSAA, and if there had been a split, a lot of (parochial and private) schools might have gone off on their own. Who would we play then?”

 

Mentor AD Jeff Cassella

 

"I haven't had a chance to look at it yet," "From what I'm hearing, I don't know what kind of benefit it has for a school like Mentor. But we'll wait and see. I'll talk to our coaches and see which way we're going to vote."

 

Dover Middle School Principal Ron Bond, the seventh- and eighth-grade representative on the state board.

 

<< “There’s still a lot of work to do, but this is still a better idea than a split.”

 

 

Quotes came from the articles listed below---

Editor’s Note – Great coverage by these writers made this article possible

 

*News Release –OHIOHIGHSCHOOLATHLETICASSOCIATION

http://www.ohsaa.org/news/board/2013-03-33CompetitiveBalanceRelease.pdf

 

@- OHSAA private-public separation vote called off, replaced by new competitive-balance proposal

http://www.cleveland.com/hssports/blog/index.ssf/2013/03/ohsaa_private-public_separatio.html

 

#- OHSAA NIXES VOTE TO SEPARATE PUBLIC-PRIVATE TOURNEYS, SCHOOLS TO CONSIDER NEW 'MULTIPLIER' REFERENDUM

http://www.the-daily-record.com/articles/2013/03/22/ohsaa-nixes-vote-to-separate-public-private-tourneys-schools-to-consider-new-multiplier-referendum

 

$-OHSSA approves new competitive balance proposal

http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20130322/SPT030101/303220115/OHSSA-approves-new-competitive-balance-proposal-

 

&- OHSAA: Separate tourney issue off May ballot

http://www.vindy.com/news/2013/mar/23/ohsaa-separate-tourney-issue-off-may-vot/?newswatch

 

%-  New plan keeps public, private schools together

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/sports/2013/03/23/new-plan-keeps-public-private-schools-together.html

 

^ - OHSAA replaces referendum with multiplier formula proposal

http://www.news-herald.com/articles/2013/03/22/sports/nh6707140.txt

 

**- OHSAA reaches compromise on tournaments

http://www.foxsportsohio.com/high-school/story/OHSAA-reaches-compromise-on-tournaments?blockID=882991&feedID=3725

 

<<Proposal for separate high school tournaments is dropped

http://www.timesreporter.com/newsnow/x609792294/Proposal-for-separate-high-school-tournaments-is-dropped

If you would like to make a statement on this, please email us at – theusbc@yahoo.com

 

Senior Reports Public vs. Private site-

www.theseniorreports.com/shakeup.htm